Proposal for a National 55 mph speed limit

THE 55 MPH WIN WIN SPEED LIMIT

  • The vast majority of people today drive petrol or diesel cars. (9 million licensed vehicles in Great Britain currently 2018) and with the best will in the world they will continue doing so for several more years. (Until 2025?)
  • Each year more hybrids and all electric cars are sold but currently there are only 212 thousand on our roads (2018) In 2018 only 2.1% of new cars were electric.  While this number will increase how long will it take to reach 50%?
  • What can we do easily, cheaply and with some effectiveness to reduce both petrol and the even more toxic diesel emissions right now for the cars currently on our roads?
  • Almost all cars, petrol and diesel, are designed to be most efficient in their use of fuel when travelling at around 55 m.p.h.
  • Roaring around at 70 to 80 mph and driving with aggressive acceleration and braking can increase fuel consumption and the expulsion of exhaust gases by 30%. (Take note Jeremy Clarke and fans)
  • Keeping to a maximum speed of 55 mph together with smooth driving can easily reduce fuel consumption by 15-20%
  • The 37.9 million licensed vehicles in Great Britain currently consume 20.4 billion litres diesel and 16.8 billion litres petrol. The average price for a litre of petrol or diesel is £1.16 p
  • Bearing in mind the older, less well maintained and aggressively driven cars on the road it should still be reasonable to expect an overall saving in fuel and exhaust gases of between 5 and 10 per cent of total fuel consumption if a national 55 mph speed limit was introduced.
  • Affecting over 40 million citizens this measure would bring home the importance of facing up to climate change with a measure that would actually save them money.
  • Properly introduced as DRIVE GREENER AT 55 mph and with new GREEN 55 speed signs and a publicity campaign about the advantages of efficient driving until you can afford an electric car this campaign could have a generally positive effect in preparing the public for the more expensive and difficult changes that fighting Climate Change will entail.
  • John Baxter johnbaxter119@nullgmail.com  johnbaxter.org  mobile 07403 616145

Continue reading

THEODICY, RELIGION AND COMPASSION July 20th 2019

THEODICY, RELIGION AND COMPASSION

Explored from a Buddhist/Humanist Perspective IRC Conference July 20th 2019
John Baxter  2019. www.johnbaxter.org email johnbaxter119@nullgmail.org

For a long retired R.E. schoolteacher to be accepted by Dr Andrew Pinsent to present this paper at the IRC conference Compassion and Theodicy is much appreciated. I hope it will lead to a fruitful discussion. Continue reading

BREXIT Some thoughts. 25-1-19

Despite the defeat of her deal by 230 votes – May seems to ignore this by continuing to discuss only her deal or no deal.  She does this to prevent her party from splitting.  The danger which gets worse daily is that this no deal “default option” may go through on the 29th of March destroying trust in our Parliamentary democracy to prevent us from a catastrophic, irrational and irreparable step as we are forced out of the EU by a very small minority of pro-Brexit at any price MPs.    So what  needs to be done to stop this happening?

Continue reading

ANVIL Wed. 19th Sept. ATHEISM the case. Dr Greg Atkins, Graham Stride

This session consisted in Greg emphasising the need for a science based approach to deciding what is true and real and concluding that all forms of supernaturalism and belief in gods ,, one god, spirits and miracles are not based on evidence.  Graham responded that as he saw it there is far more too life than what can be weighted and measured by science and that intuitively many believe as he does that behind all that is happening there is a compassionate God .  Continue reading

ANVIL April 11th Homo Deus. Presenter John Baxter, Responder Greg Atkins

Summary Notes on HOMO DEUS. A Brief History of Tomorrow by Yuval Noah Harari 2015  written by John Baxter March 2018. 5,814 words 9 pages so worth printing off.

 These notes simply seek to summarise Homo Deus as an aid to understanding the book’s challenging ideas.  It is not a review for I do not here judge what he says.   It is an aid not a substitute for reading the book and his equally challenging SAPIENS.   Continue reading